Difference between revisions of "KeckCriteria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*** Programs and projects that demonstrate that the chances of success would be seriously impaired but for the assistance of private philanthropy generally, and the W.M. Keck Foundation in particular | *** Programs and projects that demonstrate that the chances of success would be seriously impaired but for the assistance of private philanthropy generally, and the W.M. Keck Foundation in particular | ||
*** Programs and projects that encourage self-sufficiency rather than continuing dependence on W.M. Keck Foundation support | *** Programs and projects that encourage self-sufficiency rather than continuing dependence on W.M. Keck Foundation support | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Back to [[Keck Foundation Proposal|Keck Foundation Proposal]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 18 September 2005
- Keck's programmatic criteria from their program guidelines:
- Significant programs and projects that:
- focus on emerging areas of research at the forefront of science, engineering and medicine, or have the potential to lead to breakthrough technologies in these areas; or
- establish new directions and utilize creative approaches in education and research for the liberal arts and sciences at predominantly undergraduate institutions
- Programs that respond to a compelling need and have the potential to create a significant and long-lasting impact
- Programs and projects that are consistent with the Foundation's stated fields of interest
- Programs and projects that demonstrate that the chances of success would be seriously impaired but for the assistance of private philanthropy generally, and the W.M. Keck Foundation in particular
- Programs and projects that encourage self-sufficiency rather than continuing dependence on W.M. Keck Foundation support
- Significant programs and projects that:
- Back to Keck Foundation Proposal
