From Earlham CS Department
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Unit:
|
ID:
|
| Foundations |
1
|
| Static |
2
|
| Dynamic |
3
|
| Visualizing |
4
|
| Structural |
5
|
| Equation |
6
|
| Agent-based |
7
|
| Systems |
8
|
| Chaos |
9
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
| Section |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I |
C |
K |
I
|
| 1.1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.3 |
|
|
3* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3
|
| 1.4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
??* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2* |
|
|
2+* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
1*
|
| 1.6.1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3-* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3-* |
|
|
1*
|
| 1.6.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
1*
|
| 1.6.3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.6.4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.7.1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 1.7.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3
|
| 2.1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 2.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
3
|
| 2.3.1.1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 2.3.1.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 2.3.2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3
|
| 2.4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2* |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1*
|
| 2.5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
2*
|
- Foundations
- 1.3: Is it appropriate to have wikipedia pages as official class readings?
- Visualizing
- 1.4: There may be confusion re:background and reference material...
- 1.5: No change from last review?
- 1.6.2: Part of the write-up will be a link to the Google Doc, I imagine...
- 1.6.4: Where do we find these?
- Structural
- 1.6.1: "DYLAN?" ...was Dylan supposed to do something here?
- 1.6.3: "if we choose to purchase it"...
- 1.6.4: The decision to buy it or not is left unmade.
- 2.2: What about other modeling concepts?
- 2.3.2: Minor detail... "Yes" instead of "Complete", still.
- Equation
- This should have been raised earlier, but this whole unit needs a major copy-editing overhaul in order to make sense. I mean no disrespect to Vlado, but the English is very confusing.
- 1.2: "could be" &c; still somewhat vague.
- 1.3: Unclear which parts are to be read.
- 1.5: Too much complexity, yet incomplete; doesn't make the connection into the theme of the course all that well.
- 1.6.1: Unclear... comments still unaddressed.
- 1.6.2: Unclear... comments still unaddressed.
- 1.6.4: Still a little unclear.
- 1.7.1: Is this a good question?
- 1.7.2: Quiz questions unanswered. I'm sure they're buried somewhere in that PCurr document, but where?
- Agents
- 1.3: Reading needed to be condensed into manageable and defined chunks.
- 1.7.2: Quiz questions unanswered.
- 2.4 Comment unaddressed.
- Pred-Prey
- 1.3: Reading needed to be condensed into manageable and defined chunks.
- 1.5: Unfinished; comments left unaddressed, no change.
- 1.6.1: Comments unaddressed.
- 1.6.2: "Placeholder"
- 1.7.2: Quiz questions unanswered.
- Chaos
- 1.5: Bare minimum outline
- 1.6.1/2: Bare minimum process/writeup description. Comments still present, unaddressed.
- 2.4: I'm not sure this counts as "scaffolding"
- 2.5: I'm also not sure this counts as "inquiry based learning"