Hhmi-local-public-health

From Earlham CS Department
Revision as of 23:21, 15 June 2007 by Charliep (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A group of Earlham science faculty are working on a grant proposal to the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. One sub-group, the people listed below, has an interest in developing a public health/health careers compont for the proposal.

Who we are:

  • Peter Blair, Biology
  • Mike Diebel, Chemistry
  • David Matlack, Biology
  • Charlie Peck, Computer Science
  • Lori Watson, Chemistry

Our Questions:

  • Are there local public health issues that can be explored/researched/addressed by a group of motivated students and faculty during a 4 week May course, and possibly some on-going effort during the rest of the year? This program can be continued over the 4 year timeframe of the grant.
  • Are there ways that we can work with local health care providers, public and private, to expose students to the wide variety of careers in health?

Our Current Working Idea:

A 4-week pre-health May program with the following features:

  • 12 motivated, high achieving students (rising sophomores or juniors) interested in a health career (broadly defined) each session
  • 5 faculty facilitators from chemistry, biology, and computer science (2 of which are "on" during a particular session, all of which participate in the planning, development and delivery of content)
  • An overarching public health project that will span the entire program, and perhaps include a longitudinal component so that it can be modified for use each year of the grant
  • Exposure of the students to a variety of health careers (public and private)
  • Readings/discussions on humanity in medicine and bioethics
  • Laboratory and field experiments with a health emphasis
  • Possible Fall internship component with local health care providers for students that have participated in the May session
  • Possible year-round student/faculty work on the public health project (at variable levels of effort)

Notes

Peter's plan:

  • In the near future we should generate a written synopsis of each particular program component. This mock 'executive summary' should include: 1) Brief summary, 2) Statement of (educational) outcomes, 3) Mode of assessment, 4) Timeframes, and 4) Preliminary budget.