Difference between revisions of "CS382:Reviewers Notes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | General process for the first draft review: | |
| − | * | + | * Use copy and paste to insert comments into each unit. |
| − | + | * Whenever we make a review comment on a page, add the "Reviewer" tag so that the wiki can track comments for us. | |
| − | * | + | * Charlie will take care of tracking when things are turned-in and deducting points as need be. |
| − | *Charlie will take care of | + | * Reviewer colors - Ian = slategray, Charlie = red, Kay = ? |
| − | * | ||
| − | + | Review checklist for the first draft review: | |
| − | *completeness check | + | * completeness check WRT the assignment page |
**is each item addressed with more than a header? | **is each item addressed with more than a header? | ||
*layout, does this show clear thinking about the presentation? will this develop | *layout, does this show clear thinking about the presentation? will this develop | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
**is there enough, too much | **is there enough, too much | ||
**is it at the right level | **is it at the right level | ||
| − | * | + | |
| + | Review checklist for the second draft review: | ||
| + | * completeness check WRT the assignment page | ||
***be specific about exactly which sections of material in what order should be read | ***be specific about exactly which sections of material in what order should be read | ||
***background reading for teachers? | ***background reading for teachers? | ||
Revision as of 08:50, 25 February 2009
General process for the first draft review:
- Use copy and paste to insert comments into each unit.
- Whenever we make a review comment on a page, add the "Reviewer" tag so that the wiki can track comments for us.
- Charlie will take care of tracking when things are turned-in and deducting points as need be.
- Reviewer colors - Ian = slategray, Charlie = red, Kay = ?
Review checklist for the first draft review:
- completeness check WRT the assignment page
- is each item addressed with more than a header?
- layout, does this show clear thinking about the presentation? will this develop
- read background reading, make sure they make sense and are relevant
- is it reasonable
- is there enough, too much
- is it at the right level
Review checklist for the second draft review:
- completeness check WRT the assignment page
- be specific about exactly which sections of material in what order should be read
- background reading for teachers?
- be specific about WHO is supposed to read this
- two categories of reading?
- three? teacher, student, reference?
- ask them to break down the readings into this framework
- lecture notes: is what needs to be taught adequately outlined? at least so the teacher knows what needs to be covered?
- scheduling is the architects' jobs
