Difference between revisions of "CS382:Reviewers Notes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: *ready for review: reviewers can edit, make copy for the n+1 version, *consistent method for older versions: topics matrix always links to current version, and there is a block at the bot...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | *ready for review: reviewers | + | *ready for review: reviewers go in, make comments, add a custom reviewer tag, then when the time comes for them to make revisions, we can compare the latest reviewed version with the latest version |
| − | + | **"Fuck all of that!" | |
| − | ** | ||
*use copy and paste to insert comments, screw a numbering system | *use copy and paste to insert comments, screw a numbering system | ||
| + | *whenever we make a review comment on a page, add "Reviewer" tag or whatever so that the wiki versioning does the work for us | ||
GRADING | GRADING | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 18 February 2009
- ready for review: reviewers go in, make comments, add a custom reviewer tag, then when the time comes for them to make revisions, we can compare the latest reviewed version with the latest version
- "Fuck all of that!"
- use copy and paste to insert comments, screw a numbering system
- whenever we make a review comment on a page, add "Reviewer" tag or whatever so that the wiki versioning does the work for us
GRADING
- completeness check
- is each item addressed with more than a header?
- layout, does this show clear thinking about the presentation? will this develop
- read background reading, make sure they make sense and are relevant
- is it reasonable
- is there enough, too much
- is it at the right level
- FOR RELEASE 2
- be specific about exactly which sections of material in what order should be read
- background reading for teachers?
- be specific about WHO is supposed to read this
- two categories of reading?
- three? teacher, student, reference?
- ask them to break down the readings into this framework
- lecture notes: is what needs to be taught adequately outlined? at least so the teacher knows what needs to be covered?
- scheduling is the architects' jobs
