Difference between revisions of "Pkal-keck-webinar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Computational and Multidisciplinary Curriculum and Research Initiative) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | == Computational and Multidisciplinary Curriculum and Research Initiative == | |
− | * Mike Deibel and Charlie Peck | + | |
+ | * Supported by the W. M. Keck Foundation | ||
+ | * Mike Deibel and Charlie Peck (deibemi at earlham.edu, charliep at cs.earlham.edu) | ||
* Earlham College, Richmond Indiana | * Earlham College, Richmond Indiana | ||
+ | * Summer research projects and course modules with computational aspects across a wide variety of science disciplines | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
A. Our work was facilitated by | A. Our work was facilitated by |
Latest revision as of 10:25, 20 July 2009
Computational and Multidisciplinary Curriculum and Research Initiative
- Supported by the W. M. Keck Foundation
- Mike Deibel and Charlie Peck (deibemi at earlham.edu, charliep at cs.earlham.edu)
- Earlham College, Richmond Indiana
- Summer research projects and course modules with computational aspects across a wide variety of science disciplines
A. Our work was facilitated by
- Regular and established multidisciplinary meetings/communication (SciFri, SciDiv)
- Project of interest to the campus and off-campus communities and interest to students
- Project intentionally chosen to be as multidisciplinary as possible (approach and process)
B. Barriers which we experienced
- Lack of time in faculty and student schedules for new initiatives
- Staffing limitations at small schools, small departments have less inherit flexibility.
- Disciplines sometimes speak different "languages"
- Students often like to compartmentalize their education
C. Strategies and tactics for overcoming the barriers
- Regular face-to-face meetings and lots of electronic communication
- Creativity and adaptability of faculty
- Common presentation material or guest presentations of material for courses and research
- Shared field work, shared meals
D. Assessment
- External evaluation, on-site visits
- Internal surveys
- Personal analysis and reflections by faculty each year
- Exam questions (criterion referenced assessment)
E. Sustainability of multidisciplinary work
- Course module vs. separate course
- Service learning - outside of a course or built into course
- Involving pre-tenure faculty