Difference between revisions of "Commentary: Who are these people?"

From Earlham CS Department
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Who are these people? How do you suppose they were selected? Both the introduction and Raymond's history discuss a variety of populations who were party to the development of software in general, "free" software, and the notion of Open Source. How many of these populations are represented here?
 
Who are these people? How do you suppose they were selected? Both the introduction and Raymond's history discuss a variety of populations who were party to the development of software in general, "free" software, and the notion of Open Source. How many of these populations are represented here?
  
* (Comment)
+
As a very specific example:
 +
* Chris DiBona
 +
** Now: Open Source Project manager for Google.
 +
** Then: Director of Linux Marketing for VA Research and Author/Editor for Slashdot.
 +
** Sources:
 +
*** [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_DiBona DiBona's Wikipedia page]
 +
*** [http://www.dibona.com/ Dibona's homepage]
 +
 
 +
The contributors are all large players in the Open Source world. In some cases they provided the start or foundations of the entire movement (as with RMS, Perens, and a couple others).  For the most part, however, this book displays the Open Source, rather than Free Software, viewpoint.  Other than RMS, it seems most of the contributors are much more inclined to support Open Source rather than "free" software.
 +
 
 +
-- Fitz. 23:15 EST. 2 Sep 2008.

Revision as of 23:14, 2 September 2008

Who are these people? How do you suppose they were selected? Both the introduction and Raymond's history discuss a variety of populations who were party to the development of software in general, "free" software, and the notion of Open Source. How many of these populations are represented here?

As a very specific example:

The contributors are all large players in the Open Source world. In some cases they provided the start or foundations of the entire movement (as with RMS, Perens, and a couple others). For the most part, however, this book displays the Open Source, rather than Free Software, viewpoint. Other than RMS, it seems most of the contributors are much more inclined to support Open Source rather than "free" software.

-- Fitz. 23:15 EST. 2 Sep 2008.