Difference between revisions of "Commentary: NIH?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Back to [[DiBona, Ockman & Stone and Raymond]] | ||
| + | |||
What is the NIH Public Access policy? How does the distinction between "Open" and "Free" play out in this realm? What parallels and contrasts do you see with respect to software? | What is the NIH Public Access policy? How does the distinction between "Open" and "Free" play out in this realm? What parallels and contrasts do you see with respect to software? | ||
| − | + | [http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ Public Access Homepage] | |
| + | |||
| + | NIH Public Access Policy requires documents of National Institute of Health to be publicly available within 12 months after publishing. This idea is stem from the freedom of speech which includes the right to know. In the case of free/open software, source codes are available from the beginning. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Mikio. 12:14, 3 Sep 2008. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:18, 17 September 2008
Back to DiBona, Ockman & Stone and Raymond
What is the NIH Public Access policy? How does the distinction between "Open" and "Free" play out in this realm? What parallels and contrasts do you see with respect to software?
NIH Public Access Policy requires documents of National Institute of Health to be publicly available within 12 months after publishing. This idea is stem from the freedom of speech which includes the right to know. In the case of free/open software, source codes are available from the beginning.
--Mikio. 12:14, 3 Sep 2008.
