CS382:Reviewers Notes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ready for review: reviewers can edit, make copy for the n+1 version,
- consistent method for older versions: topics matrix always links to current version, and there is a block at the bottom that links to older versions with comments still there.
- could also put links to old version on the discussion page
- use copy and paste to insert comments, screw a numbering system
GRADING
- completeness check
- is each item addressed with more than a header?
- layout, does this show clear thinking about the presentation? will this develop
- read background reading, make sure they make sense and are relevant
- is it reasonable
- is there enough, too much
- is it at the right level
- FOR RELEASE 2
- be specific about exactly which sections of material in what order should be read
- background reading for teachers?
- be specific about WHO is supposed to read this
- two categories of reading?
- three? teacher, student, reference?
- ask them to break down the readings into this framework
- lecture notes: is what needs to be taught adequately outlined? at least so the teacher knows what needs to be covered?
- scheduling is the architects' jobs
