<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Viz-feedback-legend</id>
	<title>Viz-feedback-legend - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Viz-feedback-legend"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Viz-feedback-legend&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-12T12:55:10Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Viz-feedback-legend&amp;diff=13464&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Charliep: Created page with &quot;This is the legend for the numbered comments found on assignments. * [1] Make it easy to pick-out the important bits, e.g. the area of the space using that tool. * [2] Take the a...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Viz-feedback-legend&amp;diff=13464&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-09-18T09:04:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;This is the legend for the numbered comments found on assignments. * [1] Make it easy to pick-out the important bits, e.g. the area of the space using that tool. * [2] Take the a...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is the legend for the numbered comments found on assignments.&lt;br /&gt;
* [1] Make it easy to pick-out the important bits, e.g. the area of the space using that tool.&lt;br /&gt;
* [2] Take the average of the readings and then calculate the area, or calculate the areas with each set of readings and then average the areas?&lt;br /&gt;
* [3] Your visualization lacks labels/legend/etc that make it easy to identify what is what, e.g. what tool was used to produce a given value in the first lab.&lt;br /&gt;
* [4] That seems like too much precision given the tool/method in use here.&lt;br /&gt;
* [5] These could be combined into a denser rendering.&lt;br /&gt;
* [6] Use more of the paper (display surface).&lt;br /&gt;
* [7] You did not read the assignment carefully and/or follow the instructions closely.&lt;br /&gt;
* [8] You use a lot of space to communicate a relatively modest amount of information here.&lt;br /&gt;
* [9] If you know that one or more of your assumptions isn&amp;#039;t true you should explain why.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Charliep</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>