<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Commentary%3A_Pragmatism</id>
	<title>Commentary: Pragmatism - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Commentary%3A_Pragmatism"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Commentary:_Pragmatism&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-17T19:48:28Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Commentary:_Pragmatism&amp;diff=5941&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jrogers at 16:04, 23 September 2008</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cs.earlham.edu/index.php?title=Commentary:_Pragmatism&amp;diff=5941&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-09-23T16:04:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;GNU is guided by unusually clearly stated fundamental principles. But, as Stallman notes, the LGPL represents a more pragmatic choice. Why be pragmatic with respect to licensing libraries but not with respect to using non-free libraries? Does the mixing of free and non-free software undermine the principles of software freedom? Has the kind of commercialization that has occurred in the &amp;quot;Open Source&amp;quot; industry undermined those principles?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jrogers</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>